Committing criminal behavior while under the influence always is inexcusable. Those responsible enough to drink should own up to their actions and not expect a slap on the wrist in court.

This is why state representatives were correct in supporting the “under the influence” bill sponsored by Rep. Ruth Johnson, R-Holly.

The bill counters the defense that the voluntary consumption of alcohol or other drugs can legally impair an individual’s ability to obey the law.

The state House voted 100-1 in favor of the bill Thursday. Rep. Stephen Adamini, D-Marquette, opposed the bill.

Although some say the defense is rarely used in the court system, the bill is a first step in making people accountable for their actions.

Being drunk shouldn’t be an excuse. Intoxication isn’t considered a valid excuse when it comes to reckless driving and shouldn’t be considered as such in reference to other crimes.

The family of a drunken driving accident victim, or of any other crime, will not be solaced in knowing the person who committed the crime was under the influence.

It’s a factor that generally adds insult to injury for those trying to cope in the aftermath of a crime.

People should be responsible to own up to their actions without seeking excuses. Johnson’s bill reiterates this.

If one is deemed responsible enough to drink alcohol, he or she also should be held responsible for his or her actions while intoxicated.

The state House should be commended for its overwhelming support of this measure.