Sunday, March 21, 2010 | Since 1909 | East Lansing, MI Advertise | Classifieds | Puzzles | Employment | Contact Us
Feed:
Follow us on:
Mostly Cloudy, 32° F | 0° C
7 day forecast

Article Tools:

  • Share this article on Facebook
  • Digg this
  • Add to del.icio.us
  • Blogger
  • Comment feed
  • Print

Senate has not yet taken action on smoking ban bill

By Marissa Cumbers (Last updated: 11/17/09 10:00pm)

The smoke still has not cleared between the Michigan House and Senate on whether state residents should be allowed to enjoy cigarettes while dining.

It has been six months since the Michigan House passed a statewide smoking ban for public places, such as restaurants and bars, and the Senate still has not picked up the bill, which exempts casinos and cigar bars. Some representatives still are pushing for the Senate to take action on the bill, but experts said disagreement between the two houses could mean the Senate might not pick it up at all.

“Having just finished up the budget process, we are looking at our agenda for the upcoming year and we haven’t had any discussion of how we will address the smoking ban,” said Matt Marsden, spokesman for Sen. Majority Leader Mike Bishop, R-Rochester.

The Senate passed a smoking ban with no exemptions in 2008, but the House never picked up that bill, he said.

“If there is going to be a smoking ban, we don’t believe there should be carve-outs for certain establishments,” Marsden said.

But exempting casinos and cigar bars would create a “middle ground,” and 99 percent of public establishments still would be smoke free without negatively impacting the casinos of Detroit, said state Rep. Lee Gonzales, D-Flint.

“In the … days that we have before the end of the year, there are a lot of folks that want to get this smoking ban on the books in some form,” Gonzales said.

But the Senate’s lack of action suggests it might not pick up the House Bill at all, said Bill Ballenger, editor and publisher of Inside Michigan Politics.

After a bill is voted on in one legislative house, it has two legislative years to be passed in the other house. The Senate has until December 2010 to take action on this bill, Ballenger said.

“The suspicion is that the Senate doesn’t really want this bill,” he said.

Some students said they think an across-the-board ban is the only fair option.

“I feel like no smoking should be allowed in any public place,” public health graduate student Mariana Wong said. “(Allowing smoking) really excludes people who have some (health) predispositions.”

As long as the ban would include all bars and restaurants, business wouldn’t suffer, said Eric Skusa, general manager at The Peanut Barrel Restaurant, 521 E. Grand River Ave., which allows smoking.

“You just have to make plans and live with it,” he said. “You’ll have a downturn at first, and hopefully, it will come back.”

But executive director of the Michigan Licensed Beverage Association Lance Binoniemi said passing this would come at a time when the Michigan hospitality industry already is struggling.

“This is only going to make it worse — it could cost jobs,” Binoniemi said.

Originally Published: 11/17/09 10:00pm




Commentary:


Donald Salberg

11/17/09 10:48pm

As a physician allow me to remind our state senators that cigarette smoking remains an important cause for lung and other cancers and many diseases including lung (emphysema) and heart (coronary artery disease). Treatment of smoking-related illness contributes considerably to the cost of medical care. Second hand smoke causes similar diseases, endangering the healths of non-smoking patrons AND EMPLOYEES of restaurants, bars and casinos.

...

View full comment »

Bob

11/18/09 10:42am

These smoking bans will probably go down in history as one of the greatest marketing scams ever by having drug companies using tax exempt political action committees calling themselves “charities”.
Here’s the beginning of the latest ban movement in the USA.

www.rwjf.org/pr/product.jsp?ia=143&id=14912

Here are the instructions from Johnson and Johnsons’ (makers of cessation products) RWJ Foundation for their tax exempt political action committees.

...

View full comment »

Harv

11/18/09 12:55pm

I find it interesting that anti smokers never bother to research car exhaust and it’s effects.

Considering how often people walk in traffic, jog in traffic, and the time spent in your car with your air intake pointed directly at the exhaust pipe of the car directly in front of you, it’s a wonder that there isn’t more outrage from public health “advocates”.

But I guess if you can’t see it and can’t smell it, then it’s not there.

But wait, here’s a test!

...

View full comment »

Jake

11/18/09 1:15pm

This sounds like socialism to me. Since when has smoking been a huge issue till now??? It just seems to me that the government is trying to get involved in our lives even more then they already are…So to beat the bans I think people need the following.

http://www.Crown7.com

Rashid

11/18/09 3:42pm

This doesn’t really matter, since people will just smoke whitecloudecigoutlet.com if a ban does go through. (I.e., it woun’t really matter to e-cigarette smokers.)




PHOTOS OF THE WEEK:More reprints »
Photo courtesy of Wharton Center /

Performers in the traveling professional group Nrityagram perform their tradItional Indian dances.

Powered by reprints.statenews.com.