COMMENTARY
In Chuck Wynn's recent column, "Possible New Testament changes don't ruin meanings" (SN 4/20), he argues that the errors, pointed out by John Bice's, "'Truth' of Bible can't be believed with history of additions, deletions" (SN 2/21), in the New Testament do not change any major doctrine.
Although this might be true, I think the author might have missed one of Bice's more important points: the dangers of biblical literalism.
There are individuals who say women should sit aside while men do all the talking about God, based on Timothy 2:12, a highly contested New Testament epistle.
Biblical literalists, the same people who argue that every word of the Bible is as it was when God inspired it, claim that these cannot be read as anything but true, hard facts and that God doesn't want women to teach.
The recent Lads to Leaders & Leaderettes conference, run by fundamentalist religious organizations, won't even allow fathers into the room to hear their daughters speak about the Bible because girls should only speak about it to other women.