The MSU mens gymnastics team will perform one last routine to attempt to save its debunked program.
Members of the team will be present at the MSU Board of Trustees meeting Friday in an attempt to extend the program, which the athletics department has said will be cut after this year.
After originally deciding to cut the program after the 2000 season, the athletics department gave the program a one-year extension through this year.
Junior gymnast Jonathan Plante will speak to the board in hopes of getting a two-year extension granted to the program.
Its a strange situation in that the administration has no answers or refuses to give them, he said. Their arguments are all bogus - they have no legitimate argument.
The athletics department decided to cut the program in April 2000 to comply with Title IX guidelines.
Title IX is a federal law prohibiting sex discrimination in education programs that receive federal financial assistance, and was later amended to help promote gender equity in athletics.
Plante said Title IX shouldnt be a reason to cut mens gymnastics because other womens programs, such as track and crew, have emerged to balance the scale.
Plante said other arguments the university is making against the program include space and monetary issues.
The mens team has to share its practice facility with the womens team, but Plante said space hasnt been a problem and the two teams enjoy practicing with one another.
He also said the programs finances arent a problem, claiming it has made a profit.
It cant be Title IX, it cant be financial, so what is it? he said. Is it just them simply saying we dont want mens gymnastics anymore? Thats basically the only thing they have to fall back on at this point.
MSU Board of Trustees member David Porteous said he has received a letter from Plante describing what hell talk about at the meeting.
Porteous added the board agrees with the athletics departments recommendation and rendering a decision to keep the program will be difficult.
I have no doubt these athletes are dedicated young men who work hard at what they do, but the number of varsity programs has just shrunk to the level where it makes it difficult to maintain at Michigan State, he said.
Porteous said he doesnt believe Title IX is an issue in the case, just that mens gymnastics programs are too sparse around the country for one to stay at MSU.
When you have a sport where there are approximately only 21 schools competing at the Division I varsity level, that right there is unfortunately an indication that the sport doesnt have the support across the country to compete, he said.
Porteous also is a little skeptical of Plantes claim that the program made a profit this year.
I would be interested in those figures because I just dont think theyre accurate, he said.
A demonstration will also be organized outside the Administration Building before the boards 10 a.m. meeting, in which gymnasts and coaches from both MSU and Michigan will be present.
Mike Burns, assistant mens gymnastics coach at U-M, said its going to be different to see U-M and MSU athletes marching together for one cause, but its something thats necessary for college gymnastics.
Anytime something happens like that, it affects other programs, he said. It has a ripple effect.
Burns said losing programs such as MSUs lessens the opportunity for younger gymnasts to pursue a career in the sport, which ultimately affects gymnastics at its top level.
If you lose a broad base of athletes in gymnastics in college, then the Olympic level gets worse, he said.
Head coach Rick Atkinson said its mainly his gymnasts who are organizing the last-minute attempt to save the program with the board, and he doesnt plan on attending.
I busted my butt all year in coaching them and setting up places for them to go after the season, he said. What theyre doing now is all for themselves.
Atkinson said hes not ruling out the possibility of an extension and is supportive of his teams attempt, but added hes not very optimistic.
I always like to think theres hope, but didnt think the door was open on this - is it? he said.