Saturday, November 21, 2009 | Since 1909 | East Lansing, MI Advertise | Classifieds | Puzzles | Employment | Contact Us
Feed:
Follow us on:
Mostly Cloudy, 45° F | 7° C
7 day forecast

Article Tools:

  • Share this article on Facebook
  • Digg this
  • Add to del.icio.us
  • Blogger
  • Comment feed
  • Print

Voting not worth hassle if candidates not up to par

(Last updated: 11/05/08 7:11pm)

Even though Matt Damon may not approve, I chose not to vote on Tuesday.

“Rock the vote!” all my friends kept telling me. It doesn’t matter who you vote for, as long as you vote for someone. The problem is that there wasn’t a candidate for whom I felt comfortable voting, even after months of research. I eventually began toying with the idea of voting for the “lesser of the two evils,” because apparently I had to vote for someone. The more I thought about it, the more I realized my vote essentially was an endorsement of that candidate’s policies. By voting, I would be agreeing to the rules of the system and agreeing to let the lesser of the two evils dictate policy and make decisions for me.

Is it really always our obligation as citizens to vote? What if you disagree with the Electoral College system? What if you feel all the candidates are out of touch with your viewpoints? Voting legitimizes the system, the candidates and their policies.

I eventually came to the conclusion that none of the choices I was given, in my opinion, were worthy of my endorsement. What’s to stop candidates from getting more and more out of touch with my viewpoints if every time I just vote for the best candidate out of the ones I’m given even though I disagree with them?

Instead of choosing the lesser of the two evils, I’d rather choose none of the above. I refuse to endorse a candidate with whom I disagree. I’ll work hard and do well under any president. I’d rather have piece of mind knowing I stood up for what I believe in. How is that not American? I decided to reject the choices I was given Tuesday, and by doing so, I voiced my true opinion about the direction of this country by voluntarily and enthusiastically rocking the nonvote.

Arthur Manoli

microbiology and premedical junior

Originally Published: 11/05/08 7:04pm




Commentary:

MK

11/05/08 8:12pm

“after months of research. I eventually began toying with the idea of voting for the “lesser of the two evils”
And at no point in those months did your research turn up the fact that their were more than two candidates?

“I voiced my true opinion about the direction of this country by voluntarily and enthusiastically rocking the nonvote.”
Yes, if you don’t like something the best way to make it better is to do nothing. I guess, at least, you’re enthusiastic about it.

Pete

11/05/08 9:26pm

Seriously…if after months of research you still can’t find even a 3rd party candidate that more closely matches your viewpoints….you’ve got some issues. Heck, there are probably even 3rd party candidates that weren’t even on the ballot.

Methinks that maybe you should have written yourself in, as you’re the only person who apparently thinks the way you do!

If Arthur Only Had A Brain....

11/05/08 10:42pm

I’m with Pete on this one. You should have voted third party or wrote someone in. The whole lesser of two evils bit is put out there by the Democrats and Republicans to scare you into voting for one or the other. You not voting legitimizes the system just as much as voting for the major parties in this country because it shows that you’re nothing more than some complacent, sorry excuse for a man. You might think its a protest again the system, but how can it be if no one hears you? Answer me that you spineless worm!

Get Your Facts Straight

11/05/08 11:00pm

As an American it is your right to not vote.
It sounds like you made a well thouht out decision.
Dont let your friends tell you differently.

Johnston

11/06/08 12:29am

Arthur- you are ignorant.

Move to another country where you don’t have the right to vote.

hmm

11/06/08 4:47am

does this mean you did the same research on every local race, including the nonpartisans, every ballot measure, and every millage? contrary to popular belief, elections don’t just happen every four years, and there was certainly more than one position up for grabs here. i agree with the above posters – third party candidates sound like the way to go for you (and every educated voter should investigate them anyway) – but what about the rest of the ballot?

David

11/06/08 7:27am

I ABSOLUTELY agree with you! There is WAY to much emphasis on just voting, and not enough on voting for a candidate you actually believe in.

However, I think you should have been able to find a candidate who stood for your beliefs in Ralph Nader (very Liberal), Bob Barr (Libertarian), McKinney (Green/Environmentalist), or Chuck Baldwin (Strict Constitutionalist).

Great article!

Jason

11/06/08 8:50am

As was pointed out above, there are numerous issues beyond the Presidential vote which deserved your time and attention. In your months of research, did you not read at all about House or Senate races or Proposal 1 or 2? How about the importance of Chief Justice Taylor losing his seat on the Michigan Supreme Court? Maybe you did vote on these issues/positions, but your letter certainly doesn’t make that clear.

Responsibility

11/06/08 9:00am

Art, there were about two dozen votes to cast. Not voting because you didn’t like the top of the ticket meant you neglected state races, judicial races, school and county milage decisions and others. I would have thought you might have at least cast a vote for MSU Trustee, something that effects a student daily.

You have no right then to complain

11/06/08 9:12am

For Arthur, and all those who chose not to vote this year, you have no right to complain then during the next 4 years. You cannot complain about anything- economic policies, foreign policies, taxes, healthcare, etc.- because you did not go to the polls to put in your say. It absolutely PEEVES me when people complain and b*tch about a person in office (whether it’s the President, Governor, or even Senators or Represenatives) and then when asked who they voted for, they reply, “I didn’t vote.” If you didn’t vote, that’s your decision but keep your mouth shut for the next 4 years!!!

Go to China, Arthur

11/06/08 9:35am

Even if you make the decision (a stupid one at that) to not go out and vote, don’t just sit there in between the elections and expect great thigns to happen if you really have such “different” opinions about public policy. (Which I highly doubt because you didn’t even have the forthought to look into any other issue besides the presidential one). Why not get up and make your voice be heard in a different way, there are plenty of non-profit and advocacy groups whose goals are to change things because they don’t like the way things are right now.

...

View full comment »

Lazy Beeatch

11/06/08 9:46am

I didn’t vote either, I was watching Sportscenter and Food Network

Bob Vance

11/06/08 9:49am

Arthur, Officially you now have no credibility to complain about anything politically for the next four years.

Alex

11/06/08 10:35am

“Arthur, Officially you now have no credibility to complain about anything politically for the next four years. “

I love when people make this kind of laughable statement.

Let’s suppose you’re voting on the cafeteria menu. Your choices are liver and onions or roasted squid. They both sound terrible. Okay, so let’s throw three more in for fun: raw sushi, haggis, and mixed field greens.

...

View full comment »

You have no right then to complain

11/06/08 11:05am

Actually, field greens sound kinda good. Get some fresh veggies, grilled chicken, and salad dressing and it’s a pretty good meal!

And no, people have no right to complain if they didn’t step up to at least make a decision. If you don’t like the cafeteria menu, write something else in. Even if it doesn’t happen- you’ve stated your opinion and made a decision. The same applies for voting- you don’t like the candidates running? Write in your selection. Sure, they won’t win, but you made your voice heard. By sitting back and excercising “the right not to vote” you’re also excercising your right to keep quiet for however long the term is for the position being voted on.

If Alex Only Had Taste Buds...

11/06/08 11:46am

Let’s suppose you’re voting on the cafeteria menu. Your choices are liver and onions or roasted squid. They both sound terrible. Okay, so let’s throw three more in for fun: raw sushi, haggis, and mixed field greens.

Ah, the palate of a unadventurous mind! I mean squid come on! Calamari is some good shit. And sushi? Don’t knock it until you’ve tried it.

...

View full comment »

beau

11/06/08 2:54pm

Ok so you didn’t like the presidential candidates. You said you did a lot of research, doubtful at best. You mean you had no opinion on Props 1 or 2 or that neither position was what you wanted??? I mean it was yes or no, what other option do you propose? Didn’t care about who would be a MSU Trustee? No opinion about any millage proposals at all huh? Sounds like you thought the only thing being decided was for president, ever participated in an election before?

...

View full comment »

Alex

11/06/08 3:28pm

“Just realize you’re not protesting a damn thing by sitting on your ass and doing nothing. Additionally as other have pointed out, you morons missed out on voting for House, Senate and local races in addition to two statewide proposals and for a handful of judges. In short you guys really dropped the ball on this one.”

Wow, it’s almost like you weren’t standing over my shoulder when I voted in Howell (my home city). Oh, that’s right, you weren’t.

...

View full comment »

If Alex Only Had Taste Buds...

11/06/08 3:54pm

Oh, that’s right, you weren’t. I voted for every item on the ticket, so your assumptions about me and my voting record reflect your limited intellect and arrogance.

I was directing my comments towards all the nonvoters like Arthur out there not at you specifically. You’re right I don’t know your voting record and never said I did. The biggest issue I have with people like Arthur is they they think their somehow protesting, making a stand and so on.

...

View full comment »

State Grad

11/06/08 3:55pm

You are an idiot.

Dr Ron Paul MD

11/09/08 5:25pm

You are a douche-fag

Inverted logic

11/11/08 4:09pm

Not voting is not “taking a stand” but the opposite, validating whatever politics is currently in place. The author says that he’ll “do well” under any president. Really. How well would he do if we had a president who started another war, re-instated the draft, and started lobbing nuclear warheads at Iran or Pakistan? How “well” would he do in a nuclear holocaust? He’s just theorizing his laziness, a startling public performance of abject ignorance.



PHOTOS OF THE WEEK:More reprints »
Sean Cook / The State News

Gov. Jennifer Granholm speaks to a crowd about the Michigan Promise Scholarship during a rally Wednesday morning outside the Administration Building. Granholm is touring colleges in Michigan to discuss the scholarship.

Powered by reprints.statenews.com.