Circus discards animal rights

Drew Robert Winter
It’s an event that’s banned in six countries and more than 50 cities nationwide. Use of the implements it employs — poles with sharpened hooks and electric prods — are banned in localities of six states. And it’s coming to Breslin Center this April.
For the 15th year in a row, the Royal Hanneford Circus will be transforming lives and advancing knowledge at MSU, appearing on campus to show our children the value of exotic animals — by wearing glittering American flag outfits, jumping through rings of fire and doing tricks that were taught with the help of shackles.
More importantly, the circus will provide money for charity, even though at least three other all-human circuses are available, and animal circus fundraisers are discouraged by everyone from the philanthropist Kiwanis International to pain mogul Steve-O (a former Ringling Bros. performer who witnessed regular animal abuse).
The Humane Society of the United States claims circuses beat animals and deprive them of food, do not provide proper veterinary care and force animals to spend too much time in trucks and railcars that are not air-conditioned or heated.
The ill-equipped U.S. Department of Agriculture is charged with virtually overseeing the entire circus industry, and the only federal regulation governing circus animals is the 1966 Animal Welfare Act. It doesn’t even require oversight of training sessions, where much abuse occurs.
While circuses claim to comply with the Elephant Husbandry Resource Guide, it was developed by the International Elephant Foundation, partially founded by Ringling Bros. Self-regulation has never worked before, and it certainly won’t work when the ones suffering are incapable of defending themselves.
Four members of Students Promoting Animal Rights, or SPAR, and I were scheduled to meet with Breslin Center officials last week, but instead of the circus, it was our meeting that was canceled. When we finally do meet, we will present a list of both industry-wide animal welfare violations and those specific to Royal Hanneford, which include failure to provide veterinary care and failure to provide necessary documents.
Although SPAR is devoted to helping animals, the cruelty of the circus is known to most; our Facebook.com group devoted to Royal Hanneford, “Cruelty is not Entertainment,” has exploded to more than 800 MSU students in the first week.
Sen. Robert Hedlund, R-Weymouth, also spoke in disgust of the bullhooks and electric prods used on elephants, sponsoring the state Bill 2457 in August 2006, banning the devices: “Massachusetts cares about animal welfare and these are practices our society can no longer tolerate.” When a member of the party who tried to defend human torture calls something cruel, one of the world’s top universities shouldn’t tolerate it anymore either.
Even if you’re only worried about your own neck, that could be in danger, too. In 1992, an 8,000-pound elephant named Janet, while carrying five children and one woman on her back, threw her trainer 35 feet in the air and went on a rampage. Officer Blayne Doyle, who needed to shoot the animal 55 times in the head to kill her, subsequently studied tranquilizers and testified before Congress:
“I have discovered, much to my alarm, that once an elephant goes out of control, nothing can be done. It is not a predictable or preventable accident. The only thing that can be done — and even this is a danger to the public — is to get a battery of police officers in with heavy weapons and gun the elephant down.”
Animal acts are simply outdated. Government oversight is underfunded and inadequate, animals are only bred for performing and they are involuntary participants in their careers, period. MSU and Lansing should be on the cutting edge of condemning these barbaric acts, through canceling the event and enacting legislation to ban all exotic animal acts.
But a group of animal activists meeting with Breslin Center officials isn’t enough — administrators won’t act until students and citizens voice their concern. Take less time than it took to read this column and call Breslin Center at (517) 432-1989 to tell them they’re promoting cruelty and undermining their community’s image. For updates regarding our campaign against circuses, visit sparmsu.org. Whips and chains are for the bedroom, not the circus.
Drew Robert Winter is a State News columnist and president of Students Promoting Animal Rights at MSU. Reach him at winterdr@msu.edu.
Published on Sunday, February 10, 2008

Comments
Phil
02/10/08 @ 7:55pm
Nice article Drew
the Champ
02/10/08 @ 9:09pm
circus discards animal rights. so?
Wait!
02/10/08 @ 9:22pm
Wow I was reading this, and thought that we were talking about mistreatment of humans, then I realized the article was indeed about animals.
Stop crying, animals dont have rights, THEY ARE ANIMALS.
If we grant them rights then we must hold them accountable for their actions, which would include rape, murder, and cannibalism.
You make it sound like they are killing these animals left and right. I have not checked the market vaue of an elephant but I hae to believe its fairly high, and the circus will want to protect its investment.
PS:
Why dont you mention the animal rights nut jobs who firebombed our campus a few years ago.
Kacey
02/10/08 @ 9:54pm
Wait! – Animals DESERVE rights! That’s the entire point here, which you’ve clearly missed.
Drew, great job! Good luck stopping the circus. If people want entertainment, they can look in the mirrors and laugh at themselves.
its opinion picking season
02/10/08 @ 10:08pm
I really don’t think an electric prod is going to hurt an elephant. The guy said himself that it took 55 bullets to the head to bring one down. And the bullooks, well i’m no zoologist but i’m pretty sure an elephants skin is very thick.
I’m against needless torture but drew has shown us no proof or citations of animal crualty, only assumptions.
I also think its good for our children to see the vast array of animal life our world has to offer. Going by Drews logic the zoos will be next because the animals didn’t pick that profession either. Did my chicken and beef I had for dinner choose to provide me sustenance to get through the day?
Before one rights an article they need to evaluate their logic and back their claims with credible evidence because it soon can expand to include a whole lot more than is intended (or is it intended?)
Next time you go to meijer to hit the 2 for 1 sale on bags of chicken breasts be sure to ask the chicken community if you can eat them first.
Jason Van Dyke
02/10/08 @ 11:12pm
It is because of people like this that I have to carry a police-size can of pepper spray with me in my rodeo bag. Some people aren’t content just to let people entertain themselves; they want a government nanny state to regulate what we are to do each and every hour of the day. Then, on top of that, they have the gall to call us (conservatives) the fascists.
If the events involved animals being forced to kill each other – that would be one thing. But being a rodeo performer myself (in the bull riding event), I have found that much of the information spread by the animal rights movement about the conditions of circus and rodeo shows is, at best, an exaggeration. I would encourage the author of this article to ask the circus promoter for a tour of its facilities and to ask questions about the condition of its animals and the use of such things as electric prods (similar devices are not only used in rodeo and circus, but also by large animal vets). I have given many such tours to rodeo journalists. Many come away from it with an education that includes more than just the standard PETA talking points.
Jason Van Dyke
02/10/08 @ 11:16pm
Re: prods and animal skin
That is true. I am not sure about elephants but I do know that while human skin is about 1mm thick that a horse’s skin is about 5mm thick and a bull’s skin is about 8mm thick (this is why rodeo spurs – which are not sharpened – do not cut the skin of bulls or horses).
The fact of the matter is that an electric prod is the safest and most humane way to move a large animal. My cousin is a large animal vet and he uses the prods extensively. I don’t think he would do it if doing so was dangerous or overly painful.
Human Rights Advocate
02/10/08 @ 11:34pm
nut cases like this author and all his cult followers are dorks.
and… animals don’t have “rights” they way these jerks define the word.
Another Human Rights Advocate
02/10/08 @ 11:54pm
Think about this everyone. These animals do the tricks they do in the circus because they were trained with violence. They know if they don’t do the tricks something bad will happen to them. So they do them.
Logical thinking has led me to come the conclusion that animals aren’t here for us to just do whatever the fuck we want with them.
Big Top Pee Wee
02/11/08 @ 12:02am
Circus animals are treated great. they have better lives than wild animals. they are fed, sheltered, loved, and get tier one vet care.
its opinion picking season
02/11/08 @ 12:13am
Another Human Rights Activist: Hey, i’ve thought about it and logical thinking has led me to believe that you have no evidence for what you just said. It is nothing more than your ill thought out opinion. You based this opinion not on experience or research but on an your radical animal rights idea and won’t take any other explanation as fact.
And i’m guessing you are a veagan? Because if you were not, than you too are doing “whatever the f!x$” you want with them.
Amy
02/11/08 @ 12:19am
I agree with Drew and SPAR!
For people that need more convincing go to http://www.circuses.com/pdfs/fact-royal.pdf
If you guys seriously think that circus animals are “treated great” and “have better lives than wild animals” you are clearly mistaken. Do some research and you will realize that Drew and SPAR are doing a great thing. These animals need our help!!
Guy
02/11/08 @ 12:26am
these animals do not need our help b/c they are fine.
i hope the royal hanneford company sues the statenews for libel just to make a point.
circus animals are treated great. period.
Jason Van Dyke
02/11/08 @ 12:26am
The entire premise of this article is lacking in motive. Exotic animals such as those in the circus are not easy to come by – and are not easy to train. Just like a top notch racing horse, rodeo bronco, or bucking bull – their abilities make them worth more economically than similar animals. It is in the best interests of the circus owners and promoters to keep the animals in good condition so they can perform. No animal means no show – and no show means no money. In other words, the circus couldn’t survive without caring for its animals.
Again, its just an analogy, but I know first hand about how bucking bulls and horses are treated. Absolutely top notch veterinary care. One bucking bull named Little Yellow Jacket, a three time world champion bull, was valued at well over a million dollars. You had better believe that bull had the best veterinary care, food, and facilities available. Its owners couldn’t afford to let that animal get hurt and I think the same it likely true with a circus.
C. Alan Zoppa
02/11/08 @ 12:37am
It’s a red herring to claim that someone who favors the conferring of rights on to animals believes that they should be held legally responsible for their actions, or should have the right to register for gubernatorial elections.
Rights should be conferred onto creatures on the basis of their capacity to appreciate them.
The funny thing is that we all already do this. If you were riding a bicycle and accidentally crushed the life out of a rabbit, you would feel far worse than you would have felt about a beetle. We seem to understand when confronted with a somewhat intelligent animal that it at least appreciates pain, is amused by some activities, and upset by others.
Fair disclosure: I haven’t eaten meat in nearly a decade. The mainstream position among ethical vegetarians is that food animals should at least be allowed to run around outside, and should be killed in a relatively painless and not-especially-terrifying manner.
As for circuses, mammals intelligent enough to perform on command can do so because they’re intelligent enough to have some sort of inner life, which consists of a perceived past, present and future.
Bears would rather be digging salmon out of a river than juggling.
Primates are perfectly capable of sitting in a motorcycle sidecar. It is probably not their first choice.
We evolved the capacity to climb because tigers ate the not-so-lucky competitors of our ancestors. The tiger does not want your head in his mouth. Only the whips and cattle prods keep him from tearing you in two.
Another Human Rights Advocate
02/11/08 @ 12:43am
Its opinion picking season: If you are referring to the statement, “logical thinking has led me to come the conclusion that animals aren’t here for us to just do whatever the fuck we want with them,” then yes that is my opinion. I never said that was a fact. This opinion is based off of research and my compassion. And yes I am a vegan.
Townie
02/11/08 @ 1:17am
vegans are weird. and unhealthy.
Fredrik
02/11/08 @ 1:46am
There seems to be a lot of doubt about animal cruelty in circuses in these comments, ranging from “first-hand evidence” to the “logical” explanation of mistreatment not good for the show. I’m guessing this doubt comes solely from everyone’s biases, but it really doesn’t matter what you “think” because Drew claims to have evidence and that’s all that’s needed.
Ben
02/11/08 @ 7:32am
What could possibly be more American than a big circus with animals?
taryn
02/11/08 @ 7:45am
If you need some more convincing, think of it this way…
I think that most of you that are against what Drew is saying are against it because you don’t think the severity of the abuse is what it is, and also I assume most of you believe the animals that are used are not “domestic” and should be used in whatever way our human race can think of. I don’t know about you, but I’d be just as upset to see elephants and other circus animals treated so badly as I would to see someone abuse there cat or dog. It’s the same thing!!! Would you stand out and say something if you saw someone kick there dog? Then you should stand out and say something for the animals that are looked passed. You might think that Drew and SPAR are crazy, but you’re wrong…THEY are standing up for the animals that are looked past in our country, that most people don’t think of when we think animal cruelty. It’s ok to have you opinion about the protest of the circus, but atleast be informed enough to understand where SPAR is coming from..because this looks like a bunch of ill informed people who are set in there ways.
Good work Drew. It’s ok, not everyone is going to get it..but I back you.
Mike Mathieu
02/11/08 @ 8:51am
The truth is that a lot of folks think humans have the right to do whatever they damn well please with most everything on earth be it animal, vegetable, or mineral. Some how the “subdue the earth” part of the Bible gives them leave to abuse any and everything. No wonder we still behave like cavemen dressed in suits. As for the statement about what’s more American then a big circus. If you look at history I would say that should read War.
Matthew
02/11/08 @ 11:16am
Thank you Drew for another well-written piece. I appreciate the information. I had never thought about this issue before today, so I thought you might like to know that your article did have some positive impact.
As for those making wild claims and derogatory comments – let it go. Why do many of you insist on jumping on every comment board you can find and telling everyone how wrong, illogical, facist, and radical they are? Get hobbies.
J. Edward Tremlett
02/11/08 @ 11:18am
“It is because of people like this that I have to carry a police-size can of pepper spray with me in my rodeo bag”
I thought it was for a cheap high? ; )
Amy
02/11/08 @ 11:42am
I agree with Taryn. But to add to her comment too… dogs and cats are also being abused in this. Again, check out http://www.circuses.com/pdfs/fact-royal.pdf This website has more than sufficient information to make anyone change their mind on this topic.
To everyone else, do your research before you post immature comments!
Here is a post from circuses.com, take some time to read it.
The USDA cited Royal Hanneford for using inappropriate flooring in the dog and cat enclosures. The circus was cited a second time for not providing sufficient space for the dogs. The inspector noted that “a large dog is housed in an enclosure that is 29”x25”x22” high; the dog is 23” long and 20” tall at the top of its head. The enclosure does not meet required floor space.” The circus was also cited for failure to have an exercise plan, identification, and records for the dogs.
Question for Jason
02/11/08 @ 1:03pm
How is it that they get those million-dollar bucking bulls to buck? Just ask them, and they do it?
You’re right, you should be allowed to entertain yourself in any way you see fit…until and unless you’re harming something or someone else in the process. Then it’s not just about you.
What does any of this have to do with you carrying pepper spray, exactly?
Kacey
02/11/08 @ 1:21pm
It’s not about whether the animals are happier in captivity or the wild… It’s about humans using the animals how they want to, instead of letting nature take it’s course! There are reasons that some species go extinct without human interference, it’s called EVOLUTION! Humans need to get out of the way, and stay out of the way of the natural events that occur to animals.
Yes, if we tear down a forest that animals live in, we should relocate them to a safe place. But this doesn’t mean capture them and force them into a life of confinement at a zoo or force them to entertain us. This also does not mean we should collect them and continue to reproduce them so we can stuff our overweight faces!
Just let them be!
Nina
02/11/08 @ 6:18pm
Great Article!
I can’t imagine how the elephants must feel, being kept in a trailer all day, and only coming out to perform and be, “trained”. This confinement has to be maddening for them, as they have territory ranges of up to 5,900 square miles and are constantly patrolling and foraging through this area. I would go crazy and attack people too if I had was meant to roam that much!
Also, elephants actually have very sensitive skin, especially behind the ears, on their faces, and behind the joints. These are the areas that are usually pierced when giving injections and I imagine this where the bull hooks are applied, the animals would have a hard time responding to the tip of this, “training” tool if it were applied elsewhere.
The only way these animals submit to the trainers is by being subjected to beatings and forced into doing tricks and other unnatural behaviors out of fear.
hoosteen
02/11/08 @ 6:46pm
This was a great article. As far as “rights” go, no one has them. There is no such thing as human or animal rights, but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t respect humans as well as animals. The circus is a barbaric institution in terms of how they treat the animals. Human beings ought to respect animals and leave them alone. We do enough damage to the planet already without having to enslave and mistreat animals in the name of entertainment or research. If anyone wants to see what kind of a future some lucky circus elephants have then to www.elephants.com.
Mr. Anonymous
02/11/08 @ 7:30pm
With these “animal right fanatics” we can expect laws forbidding us to kill insects, huntings, eating meat, wear furs, no circus, no zoos, no animal testing, no horse pulling carriages like the ones in New York City and Vienna, Austria in Europe, and even banning the old movie comedies, or “Tarzan films”, like Curly of the “Three Stooges” battling a monkey [Its “demeaning” to the monkey]. Yes, I totally DISLIKE animal rights fanatics, completely. Don’t mark me wrong: I would not harm a dog or cat, nor a squirrel, I don’t hunt personally and like to see the birds flying around. I will never harm them. But also love a good chicken stew with rice and salad. Yummy! “Animal rights fanatics” can go to hell.
P.D.: The “animal rights fanatics” don’t seem to realize this: the uses of animals is what pushed humanity to this civilization we are living now. Didn’t the crog magnon men of the “stone age” hunt boars to eat, and wear the fur to protect them from the “Ice Age”?
Put that big mac down
02/11/08 @ 9:29pm
Unless everyone of these people that posted in favor of animal rights is a vegon you’re hypocrites. Protect the animals you say, as you’re sitting at your table eating a burger.
What do you have to say about carnivores or omnivores? Are they not giving the other animals the rights they deserve?
All this is no diffierent from what we humans do, which so many people seem to have a problem with.
I’m against torture, but you peple are jumping all over this story,obviousely on a very strong bias because there is no proof to anything you are stating. Maybe some isolated incidences, but you people are not out to stop those isolated occurances, you are out to shut down the entire industry. A very strong idea for no proof. Where is the sense in all this?
Phil
02/12/08 @ 12:35am
Mr. Anonymous: Are you saying that we should act like cave men? I guess we haven’t gotten any smarter since the ice age.
Put that big mac down
02/12/08 @ 12:44am
Phil: out of the hole argument Mr. Anonymus or anyone else posted the only thing you can attack is the poor cave man analogy.
It appears that you were not capable argueing with any other claims. Why? Oh, because maybe we are on to something and you’re not. We are actually making valid points. Where are yours?
Chris Cuyar
02/12/08 @ 8:28am
Everyone should watch the Penn and Teller episode of Bullshit on this. It’s quite funny.
Mr. Anonymous
02/12/08 @ 6:56pm
My point is animals have been used since the dawn of humans. We hunted to feed and wear furs. It is a natural condition for our ancestors to survive. Really, there is no mystery. This information you can find it in any book of history and antropology. Before I finish, let me tell these “animal rights fanatics” one small point: do not go to Puerto Rico and Philippines. In those places killing of pigs and other farm animals is considered a “family celebration”, where even kids participate. And is quite “interesting” to see kids having “fun” while the pig is sacrificed for the holidays parties. Among many Puerto Ricans, and I know…my parents are Puerto Rican…killing a pig is quite a party given once a year. So what’s the problem?
Phil
02/12/08 @ 10:38pm
Put that big mac down: What valid points did he make? All he said in that whole paragraph was that he supported animal cruelty and speciesism.
If being against cruelty to animals everytime makes me an animal rights fanatic then I’m proud to be an animal rights fanatic. I am also against racism and sexism everytime. Does that make me some sort of human rights fanatic too?
We have gotten smarter over the years. We don’t need to exploit animals anymore. Our speciesist attitudes are causing us to destroy our planet.
Look Again
02/13/08 @ 7:30am
http://www.circuses.com/circuses.asp
PERIOD. I’m not a vegan nor would I really consider myself an animal rights activist; but this absolutely disgusted me.
larry
02/13/08 @ 10:56am
Even if you don’t think animals have rights, conditions could certainly be much more humane. This is a circus that continuously gets cited for violations, refuses to let people do tours of its facilities, and canceled on a very civil meeting. Let’s find something better East Lansing. I don’t want to be a party to torture. If we are going to teach our kids about the animals our world has to offer, let’s do it in a way that promotes a positive relationship between other animals and humans. There are plenty of events that treat animals well that we can bring here.
Mr Anonymous, it is true that using animals is a large part of how humans got to where we are. But, being humans we have the ability to control our world and culture now. If we decide that we don’t want torture to be part of our ethic (not saying we have decided that) then we should choose to get rid of it. And if that is part of Puerto Rican culture then they can make their own choice about it. But the point here is, as a community, let’s now support animal cruelty in this form. We are quite better than that I hope.
Amy
02/13/08 @ 11:35am
good post larry!
Mr. Anonymous
02/13/08 @ 4:00pm
You call it “speciesm”, whatever that name means and I don’t mind. Anyway, I call it “cultural relativity”. Some cultures make a “fuss” with “animal cruelty”. Others don’t give a damn. Why argue.
Mr. Anonymous
02/13/08 @ 4:33pm
In Puerto Rico, the killing of the pig for the holidays, especially Christmas, is so celebrated that even they put it in music. And some Christmas postcards the picture of a pig on stick through his body on charcoal is also printed. And I can give you the songs written: “y el lechon se coge, se mata y se pela”. Or “that pig you get it and kill him”. “y se pone en la vara y se da candela”. “You put him through a stick and put him on charcoal”. And accompanied with guitars, maracas, trompets and dancing. Plus drinking liquor. Is cultural. I bet Philipinos have a similar celebration. Believe me, if you go to Puerto Rico and try to stop it as “animal cruelty”, is an almost invitation for a riot. Not that I am for violence. No. Is that cultural part of the people are so hard, superhard, to get rid of. Of course we got Puerto Ricans vegetarians. And even some “vegans”. But most never pay attention to these people. They will say, “cada loco con su tema”. Means, “any crazy guy got an opinion”. Bye!
Mr. Anonymous
02/13/08 @ 4:41pm
P.D.:So some say we have gotten “smarter”? Are you sure? I see a world marching to nuclear destruction sooner or later. And I will vote democrat.
John
02/13/08 @ 5:21pm
Democrats and republicans are pretty much the same thing. They all like war and hate freedom.
Put that big mac down
02/13/08 @ 6:40pm
Phil: No one here is for torture or animal cruelty. Please post a quote if we said that.
Again, you people are all over this, for what reasons I don’t know. If they’re really torturing these animals then yes I do agree they should be stopped (only the ones that are torturing, not the entire industry) but proof needs to be shown first. If it’s as bad as its made out to be you should expect to see the animals in the performance with signs that they have been tortured. Also a tortured animal is not a stable animal, they will eventually turn on the trainer or cause trouble during the shows. Something that I’m sure happens occasionally but all animals do that at times.
For some reason everyone is just a little too caught up with this. Maybe its some sort of secret agenda, I really don’t know. There are plenty of ways you can channel your energy to help the world, one is by helping the countless number of Humans that are in desperite need of care worlwide. Be proactive for humans first, think of animals second.
Oh, and Phil. I do believe that humans are superior to animals, if we were not than we should make no effort to help them. Animals cannot voluntarily help us but we can voluntarily help them, that makes us superior and if that makes me a “speciest” then so be it.
Again, I’m against animal cruelty but I also think you people should put that same kind of effort and compasion into helping people first.
Phil
02/13/08 @ 7:16pm
Put that big mac down: I am proactive for humans. I sponsor a kid through the organization EARTHWARD. I try to help humans whenever possible. Just because I care about humans, though, doesn’t justify me supporting cruelty to animals.
Your entire second paragraph is just a giant assumption. It doesn’t look like you have done any research on circuses after reading that.
I agree with your fourth paragraph though. We are smarter than animals. We don’t show it though with that way we treat them.
In conclusion, being against human suffering does not justify continuing to mistreat animals.
Barnum and Whaaaaat?
02/13/08 @ 10:13pm
In circuses, animals are tortured on a regular basis.
When eating animals, animals are [supposed to be] killed in a quick and painless fashion.
I’d rather be killed quickly and painlessly than to be tortured regularly in a traveling circus.
If you believe that we should do whatever we want with animals, remember that they have nerves, nerve endings, and brains. They have blood. They experience pain like we do; the fact that they can not express their pain in words does not make the pain non-existent.
Having this circus come to MSU is against MSU’s current motto/slogan/whatever they put on the msu.edu website and on those flags that are on light posts around campus: “Advancing knowledge. Transforming lives.” Circuses don’t advance knowledge. If you want to learn about animals in Lansing, go to the Potter Park Zoo. The only life transforming this show will do is putting cash in the pockets of animal abusers, and hurting animals used in the show.
Good luck to SPAR; great article, Drew! :)
snoopy
02/13/08 @ 10:37pm
Will ferrel or any other type of entertainment at breslin or wharton don’t advance knowledge or transform lives.
Peter
02/13/08 @ 11:06pm
I saw two elephants getting it on in the zoo. It was evident the female wasn’t enjoying herself because she didn’t as much as make an elephant noise. Plus, her man was a white elephant, not an African elephant and I think we all know what that means.
It’s common knowledge circuses tend to use African elephants and I’m almost positive that female elephant would have been much happier at the circus.
marie
02/16/08 @ 5:48pm
This one is for Townie. Anyone that would suggest that
vegans are unhealthy and weird are just ill informed and
obviously weird themselves. Maybe if there were a lot more
vegans at MSU I wouldn’t have to strain my eyes walking around
campus looking at such fat,young and out of shape people. Let’s face it circus shows should have ended years ago. signed-concerned about people like Townie
Mr. Anonymous
02/16/08 @ 7:28pm
No, my dear Marie. Vegans are just mentally maladjusted. Can’t face the real world. And circus have brouhgt entertainment to billions. Ever heard of the world famous Moscow Circus? People like you make our lifes much poorer.
Molly
02/17/08 @ 4:41pm
Vegans are not unhealthy or maladjusted. There is a very beautiful and healthy idea about trying to nourish our bodies from the energy from the sun. If you, Mr. Anonymous, took any nutrition classes you would know this. It is not difficult or unhealthy to be a vegan. The essential proteins a human needs can be found in many plants, beans, and oils.
Human bodies are not suitable for being carnivorous. Do you notice any large claws or teeth? Even our stomachs do not contain the proper enzymes to digest animal proteins, this is why we have to cook the animal meat we consume. If you ate a raw steak you would be very sick.
It isn’t just animal rights which should convince you to be a vegan or a vegetarian. The dairy and meat industries work closely with the USDA to give us our “food pyramid”, the methane from our over populated farm animals is one of the largest contributors to global warming, and the number one killer of Americans is cardiovascular disease from all of the saturated fats we take in from meat and dairy.
Even though becoming vegan is the ideal, at least people are thinking about animals enough to take a stand. None of us are perfect or will ever be, but why not keep working towards ideals? Even though I feel strongly that all humans should not consume animal products, I would still pat a hamburger-eating, egg-eater on the back for even trying.
When was the last time you were brave enough to fight for a better world? I appreciate your bravery, Drew.
Mr. Anonymous
02/18/08 @ 5:32pm
And how do you explain Argentinians, real meat eaters, like “beef on charcoal” [churrascos] have LOWER cancer rates than the people of USA and Europe? Many of you “vegans”, I understand moderate vegetarians, are misinforming the public. You can’t fool me. I state what I stated. No excuse. You have one purpose only: push your lifestyle to the rest of us humans militantly like some religious “fundamentalists” misionaries, I can understand the traditional Christian fundamentalists, or even Muslims. And I eat more cereals, more fruits and vegetables than meat. However, I still love that chicken stew. Yummy! Bye!