Axing of guarantee unfair to students
This is in response to the recent State News editorial (Past its prime, SN 7/9) and the tuition increase in general.
This is in response to the recent State News editorial (Past its prime, SN 7/9) and the tuition increase in general.
Safety should be paramount for school administrators these days, but like anything else, they need to use discretion and common sense in most cases.The case-in-point is Jeremy Hix, who just finished his junior year at Holt High School.
I am writing in response to Andrew Banyais column regarding abortion (Latest administrative action provokes anger, SN 7/9). I must strongly disagree with Mr. Banyais implied contention that our laws and government should be morally neutral.
An envelope arrives in the mail and tells you that you have to make time in your busy schedule for jury duty.
I completed my undergraduate studies here at MSU and enjoyed it so much that I chose the institution for my graduate program.
I am ashamed to hear a member of my fraternity (especially a former president) make comments like we were unfairly treated because of our location (Sigma Chis future in limbo, SN 7/5). I am a Sigma Chi and a 1993 MSU graduate who cant understand what the heck is happening at 729 E.
Pro-life or pro-death? Pro-choice or pro-tyranny?Imagine the political talk shows if moral questions were this easy to resolve.
Pakistans self-appointed president, Pervaiz Musharraf, is scheduled to meet Indian Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee this month.
After seven years of the tuition guarantee, the state Legislature has forced university officials to consider hiking tuition as much as 10 percent for students.
I would be interested to know why the MSU Grounds Crew has cut down so many old-growth oak and elm trees the past few years.
How many of you undergraduate students plan on giving to MSU upon graduation? You will be getting phone calls shortly after you receive your diploma, asking for donations for various funds to support the university.
Many college kids are packing up for travels this summer - my best friends already in Greece and various other friends and classmates will soon be crossing the pond.
At long last, Im writing a column about fraternities and sororities. Ive put it off until now for two reasons.
After weeks of increasingly heated debate that has threatened to obscure the real issue at hand, President Bush is close to making a decision on whether the government should pay for research on stem cells extracted from human embryos. Stem cells are found in embryos and some adult tissues and can develop into brain cells, liver cells, heart cells and other parts of the body. Embryonic stem cells have generated great excitement among scientists because they are believed to have the potential to grow into any cell or tissue in the body, and consequently may be able to repair and replace damaged tissues and organs. Although it is possible to extract stem cells from adult tissue, embryonic cells have unlimited ability to proliferate and form new tissue in the laboratory, making them superior for research use. While advocates of federal spending for such research say the promise of new treatments or cures for Parkinsons disease, Alzheimers disease and diabetes is more than enough to justify government support; the Roman Catholic Church, anti-abortion activists and many conservatives object to using stem cells extracted from embryos, even those from fertility clinics that might otherwise be discarded. Despite the opposition, the White House is reportedly leaning toward support of a plan that would permit government-funded research to use discarded embryos created during infertility treatments. This plan would be similar to the one already put in place by former President Bill Clinton that allows federal funds to support research on stem cells created during fertility treatments. Although this is a no-win situation for the Bush administration, it will please the most people and placate the most interests by adopting some form of this idea. While the Catholic Church can be said to represent the views of a significant percentage of the American people, the majority of Americans do not prescribe to its conservative ideology. Anti-abortion activists are also found on the extreme side of the political spectrum, and it has been shown in many public opinion polls that most people do not agree with their views on abortion. Likewise, the opinions of overly conservative politicians are not always in sync with those of the general populace, as evidenced by the focus on the moderate voter prevalent in last years presidential election. In fact, some of Capitol Hills most right-wing voices have spoken in support of stem cell research - including South Carolina Sen.
I felt really old the other day. Im sure it had nothing to do with attending my friends bachelor party the night before, but more with a conversation I had with a few friends about old-school comedians, and buying comedy albums (yup, vinyl records). I was telling the story about the first album I ever bought, at a drug store near my home in 1982, which was Steve Martins Lets Get Small. One of the tracks was called Smoking, and the big joke was Mind if I smoke?
I love being a guy. Not because of the traditional perks, but because of the behavior that comes along with it.I like spitting off buildings and exaggerating stories to show how macho I am.
The Red Cedar River is about to get a face-lift and its a good thing too, because its been getting pretty ugly lately. Last fall, researchers found unusually high levels of E.
With regard to Rishi Kundis column (Good grades dont always make good doctors, SN 6/21): touchdown Mr. Kundi!
Were all getting pretty ticked off by drivers on cell phones, but new legislation in New York doesnt consider the many implications of banning phone calls while driving. The state Assembly passed a bill Monday prohibiting drivers from holding a cell phone to their ears.
It is extremely disappointing that President Bush, supposedly representing all Americans, calls on science only to support his particular views, while claiming a future world view superior to that in Europe where informed critics are raising questions.