I am writing in response to the editorial titled "Coast conflict" (SN 3/18). The ignorance of the author is so blatant I was rather stunned to see the article in print.

First of all, I want to state for the record that I agree with the idea that anyone should be allowed to utilize public property, provided they use it properly. However, we are now discussing the use of private property. This includes land that was purchased by a person with the intent of using that property for their own personal uses and having a right to ask trespassers to leave.

We should also consider that this law would not only apply to people strolling down beaches, but also to people causing disruptive behavior. As a former beachfront resident, I cannot tell you how frustrating it can be to have passersby drop garbage onto your front yard. I actually have witnessed people crossing onto my deck when the water lines were slightly high. So when the water is high, do I suddenly lose the rights on my property that makes no contact with the sand?

Beachfront property is specifically targeted to have higher real estate value and property taxes. The people living there pay the high price to enjoy nature without public interruption. If people want the opportunity to enjoy the Great Lakes, but don't have the funds to own a piece of expensive beachfront property of their own, they can make use of any number of the state's public metro and state parks.

It is not greedy to desire privacy. It is a privilege that law-abiding citizens are given in this country. So before you make such a harsh judgment on people, you might like to consider how you would feel if your privacy was violated.

Sarah Rotole
2001 graduate