Democrats must avoid arrogance
(Last updated: 05/20/09 9:34pm)Two weeks ago, after 29 years as a Republican senator, Arlen Specter crossed the aisle and became a Democrat. This action alone, which gives the Democrats a potentially filibuster-free majority in the Senate, isn’t even the most interesting part. That distinction goes to the reason why.
Justin Covington
According to a CNN.com article, Specter said his move was partially made to ensure that he remains one of Pennsylvania’s senators. The implication is that he would have lost the Republican Party’s nomination for the 2010 elections due to his liberal voting record. Specter is one of three Republicans to vote for President Barack Obama’s stimulus bill.
Combine this with the fighting among Republicans over the future of their party, and a question arises: Are we in an era of pro-Democrats or anti-Republicans?
Some would say the country has turned pro-Democrat. The switch came in the 2006 congressional elections, when Democrats regained control of both the House of Representatives and the Senate.
The new Democratic majority in the house allowed Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., to become the first female speaker of the house.
Democratic congressional control was solidified during the 2008 campaign, when congressmen and women harnessed Obama’s popularity and George W. Bush’s unpopularity to reach an even greater majority in both houses.
In the executive branch, Obama won in what has been deemed an “electoral landslide.” Obama ran on a message of transparency and change, which offered a clear alternative to the eight years of secrecy during Bush’s terms.
These recent events seem to suggest that the majority of Americans have become slightly more Democratic, but that might not be the case.
A recent article on fivethirtyeight.com, a statistical political analysis site, claims party identification correlates to the time at which a person came of voting age. The author of the article, Nate Silver, gives the example that people who came of age during George W. Bush’s presidency are about eight points more Democratic than the rest of the country.
This suggests that college-aged Americans are weary of Republicanism. The split could be seen anecdotally throughout campus during the 2008 election. The only candidate who seemed to rival Obama’s popularity was Libertarian Party member Ron Paul, not Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.
Obama and Paul’s popularity correlates with Silver’s analysis — that as a generation, we are more anti-Republican than anything else. Obama won by differentiating himself from the Republican Party that my generation grew up with.
We saw a president, seemingly controlled by his advisors, squander a budget surplus, drastically increase military spending on a war against a subjective idea (terrorism) and engage in domestic culture wars that split the nation rather than united it. We also grew up with a president who holds the distinction of having both the highest and lowest approval ratings of any president.
With all these issues, it is almost shocking that McCain did as well as he did. McCain attempted to spin himself as a “maverick.” He even had a female running mate in Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin. This simply was not enough to overcome the bad will built up against the Republican Party.
The major loss in 2008 has forced Republicans to rethink their approach to politics. The party has tried, citing Palin, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal and Republican party chairman Michael Steel as examples of the “inclusiveness” of their party. While each of these people adds a different external appearance, the politics are still the same.
On the other hand, some Republicans are calling for a return to fiscal conservatism, which was sorely lacking from the Bush presidency.
The in-fighting could even potentially lead to a rise in libertarianism, which stresses small government, fiscal responsibility and states’ rights.
Whatever the solution for Republicans is, the Democrats better hope it isn’t figured out before 2010. The winning streak for Democrats is bound to end eventually. After all, they didn’t even earn it on their own merits.
Justin Covington is a State News guest columnist and a political science and journalism major. Reach him at coving27@msu.edu.
Originally Published: 05/20/09 7:21pm













Alum
05/21/09 8:46amCongratulations Justin, this is one of the best opinion pieces i’ve seen on the State News in a rather long time.
Good Work. I hope we’ll hear more from you in the future.
Tim
05/21/09 9:34amA couple of good articles in a row from the State News. It’s too bad that politicians don’t recognize things like this. It also goes to illustrate why mud slinging is so popular. Winning is often based on making voters more afraid of the other guy not actually convincing them your ideas are better.
Hope
05/21/09 12:43pmRead the Editorial today the One about Religion….Hope that you like the article the way I do. And much more……Gottaa go, be back in 4 hours to read more!
common sense
05/21/09 3:24pmWow, a good piece! And it’s thoughtful! Sure this is the SN? Hope this dude keeps his job in the fall!
To answer your Q, I think people are just anti-GOP, for years of their BS. The Dems suck almost as much, but it’ll take another yearish of spiting the GOP before we can deal with how much the Dems (i.e Pelosi, the Messiah) blow too. Maybe more for the Messiah since he makes such good speeches.
Sparty
05/21/09 5:01pmExcellently written. Sadly, I think besides the abortion issue, there really isn’t any differences to the two parties right now. They all just fight for job security, and nothing else.
05/24/09 4:47amMeh, 6 years ago or so people were saying the same thing about the Democrats. The Democrats cant be good forever. They’ll mess up, get more scandals, ruin the country somehow and in 10 years we’ll be saying the Democrats are down.