COMMENTARY
The battle over affirmative action in Michigan and MSU has been controversial from the very beginning.
In the past couple of years, speeches from affirmative action opponents and supporters at MSU have led to arguments, heated discussions and calls to the police.
Much of this drama has been centered around the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative, a ballot proposal that would "ban public institutions from using affirmative action programs that give preferential treatment to groups or individuals based on their race, gender, color, ethnicity or national origin for public employment, education or contracting purposes."
The supporters of the initiative gathered enough signatures and submitted them to the Secretary of State, which is the way ballot proposals make it to the voters.
But the proposal has been stymied by accusations that the wording is misleading and causes people to think it would do something other than what it does.
The Board of State Canvassers has repeatedly refused to certify the signatures, despite an order from the Michigan Court of Appeals that the initiative get placed on the ballot.
The board is composed of two Republicans, who, at their last meeting on the issue, voted to certify the petition, while one Democrat voted against it and the other abstained.
The meeting became heated and a table was almost overturned in the debate.
Affirmative action debates have become a circus in Michigan betraying the fact that it is such a serious issue that could have long-lasting implications.
Accusations that voters were misled is something people should think about when voting in November.