COMMENTARY
Joshua Romero's recent letter, "Manuscripts support many Bible passages" (SN 3/02), contained some fictions.
First, Romero mischaracterized my column "Truth of Bible can't be believed" (SN 2/21), making it appear that I was arguing something I wasn't.
With regard to New Testament manuscripts, Romero claimed I had indefensibly asserted, "We can't know what the originals said." In reality, I wrote, "It's impossible to know with certainty what the original manuscripts said." Rephrasing a person's assertion to make it easier to attack is a popular and effective strategy, albeit intellectually dishonest.
More annoying, however, was that Romero skirted my central point.