Imagine a group of people who promote white supremacy, anti-Semitism, racism, anti-Catholicism, homophobia and nativism. A group that outwardly hates blacks, Hispanics, Latinos, Arabs, immigrants and homosexuals.
Proposal 2 is a touchy subject. It must be handled delicately and professionally if you want your opinion to be heard.
In reading the article about students' response to the MSU Board of Trustees meeting, "Trustees' Prop.
Students are finally collectively angry enough to band together and fight a worthy cause. The banning of affirmative action — thanks to the passing of Proposal 2, the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative, or MCRI — brought more than 125 upset students to Friday's MSU Board of Trustees meeting. Although some students were a bit immature — not waiting for their turn to speak and not allowing trustees the opportunity to give answers to their questions — students' anger and frustration is completely warranted. Students want a response to the passing of the MCRI from the trustees and from MSU President Lou Anna K.
I was disappointed to hear that Trustee Joel Ferguson believes the MSU Board of Trustees should remain quiet and stay away from media attention in order to lessen the impact of Proposal 2.
The Michigan Civil Rights Initiative, or MCRI, has nothing to do with civil rights. With a misleading name and a suspected illegal ballot placement, the proposal, which sadly passed in Michigan last week, bans affirmative action in certain cases.
"She can really hold her liquor," Republican Sen. John McCain said of Democratic Sen. Hillary Clinton. The quote is found deep in a 14-page article of November's The Atlantic magazine.
Funny how the meaning of words change over time. For example, when Abraham Lincoln was president, he was considered a Republican — although by today's standards, he would have been a Democrat.
This letter is in response to several statements made regarding the passing of Proposal 2. For the record, I voted in favor of Proposal 2 — Proposal 2 has passed.
I couldn't vote the other day. Although I was on a list in Wilson Hall, I couldn't do it. It wasn't the candidates or the proposals — however confusing those were.
I am writing in response to Jessica Byrom's column about abortion, "Casualties of war mourned, not those killed by abortion" SN 10/26.
This election season brought about some major change. Democrats are in and — just like lots of Republicans — Donald Rumsfeld is out.
It seems everyone — well, non-Republicans, at any rate — from the media on down are thrilled about the outcome of the 2006 midterm elections. I should be, too.
Now that MSU's administration has made the right move and has given John L. Smith his walking papers, hopefully it will think more carefully about the next person it hires.
Elections are over. Proposal results are in — and the result to at least one Michigan proposal is embarrassing. The most important ballot measure Michiganians voted on this election was, without a doubt, Proposal 2 — the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative.
Voters handed a victory to the Democrats on Tuesday — and the MSU Board of Trustees followed this pattern, with Democrats George Perles and Faylene Owen taking seats away from GOP incumbents Dave Porteous and Dee Cook. Our favorite candidate, MSU social relations sophomore and Green Party member Lauren Spencer, came in a strong fifth with more than 100,000 votes, and even though she lost, she said she would still attend board meetings. But not everyone is as gracious as Spencer.
A funny thing happened Nov. 7 — the Democrats won. Sure, pundits from coast to coast were predicting a strong Democratic win in the congressional elections, but those predictions usually were peppered with guarded optimism over the outcome.
I'd like to address a statement made in the "Reduce effects of global warming now" editorial (SN 11/1). The statement in the third column of the editorial said, "Global warming is scientific fact and needs to be addressed immediately." This statement is false and almost blatantly so.
I am writing to contradict your claim that working in cheese production at the MSU Dairy Plant is a "dirty job" ("Dirty Jobs," SN 11/7). I begin by questioning the reasoning behind including a sterile food production plant alongside other work places that include "pooper-scoopers." The MSU Dairy Plant meticulously complies with all health department standards, making it a clean work environment. Secondly, I would like to correct erroneous claims made by your reporters.
It's election time and you know what that means. No, not a sterling representation of democracy in action by which we lead the world by example, but rather the same bumbling failure and incompetence that has plagued elections since 2000.