Disbelief in God due to lack of proof shows gall
In his letter "Argument is insulting to atheists, has no validity" (SN 2/14), Mark Adler rather unkindly suggests that Matt Cowan's religious analogy in "Christianity doesn't need column to incite reaction" (2/7), is among "the most ridiculous that (he has) ever heard," and that "the argument is completely without substance." I confess I am inclined to agree with him, in part.