Friday, December 27, 2024

Take a peek behind the curtain and test drive the NEW StateNews.com today!

Affordable tuition necessary to future 

Farhan Bhatti

They tell us we are the future. They talk about the unlimited potential of our generation. They remind us that if we work hard, the boundaries of what we can accomplish are almost limitless.   

Then, they cut our funding. ?For years, state governments have placed a dagger in the dreams of many young people by continually making higher education a low priority, forcing universities to raise tuition. Michigan ranks near the bottom in this category compared to other states, coming in a stellar 48th place in funding growth for higher education during the past 10 years.   ?Gov. Jennifer Granholm, in her State of the State address, proposed a tuition freeze to help students and their families weather the economic storm we currently face. Michigan leads the nation in unemployment, coming in at 10.2 percent. Home foreclosures are continuing at an alarming rate. People are leaving the state to find work and to establish residency for their children, often finding the situation in other states appreciably better than what we have here in Michigan. The average in-state undergraduate tuition in Michigan at a four-year public university for the fall semester in 2008 was $9,079, up 44 percent since 2004, while the average nationally for the same semester was $6,585, up 28 percent since 2004.?As student loans continue to mount, most students would welcome a freeze in tuition next year. The big question, however, is what happens the following year? If the state does not act to address structural problems that universities are facing, tuition simply will rise the following year in a way that would likely make up for next year’s proposed freeze.   ?We’ve seen how ugly unfunded mandates can be. The No Child Left Behind Act, a bipartisan catastrophic lapse of judgment, imposed new accountability regulations for schools nationwide without giving them the support necessary to meet the new standards. The state, led by the governor, needs to make a strong pledge to offer more resources to help universities cover the losses of a proposed tuition freeze. ?MSU President Lou Anna K. Simon referred to this in her State of the University address by saying, “We know that education and technology and science are the key to the future … but no one seems to want to support it and support it in a sustained way so that we can really accomplish the goals we need to accomplish.”

“Partnership requires two-way communication,” she added. “It requires a bridge to somewhere, as opposed to a bridge to nowhere.” ?That bridge to nowhere is the bridge we may currently find ourselves on. To go along with her tuition freeze, Granholm also proposed a 3 percent cut in funding for higher education, effectively passing the buck to universities, forcing them to shoulder the financial responsibility of her unfunded mandate — and promising to withhold federal stimulus money from those universities who fail to comply. ?Like every other enterprise in the state, universities can and should be called upon to tighten their belts, but academic institutions can only tighten to a certain extent. It would not be prudent to have universities shoulder a disproportionate burden in alleviating the state’s budget shortcomings because universities are major engines of job growth. In this stuttering economy, we need all our job-creating engines firing on all cylinders. More money for universities and more affordable tuition for students will lead to a more highly skilled work force, ready to do the jobs of today and create the jobs of tomorrow. A commitment from the state will mean those jobs will be created here in Michigan instead of elsewhere. ?Keeping tuition low for students is a praiseworthy endeavor. But when universities are asked to make a commitment to freeze tuition, that commitment only can be made with the expectation that the entity ordering the tuition freeze, the state government, will help universities recover at least some of the lost revenue in order to continue maximizing the economic impact of our state’s universities. State legislators should bear this in mind before passing the governor’s proposed budget.

 
Farhan Bhatti is a State News guest columnist and a second-year medical student. Reach him at bhattifa@msu.edu.

Support student media! Please consider donating to The State News and help fund the future of journalism.

Discussion

Share and discuss “Affordable tuition necessary to future ” on social media.

TRENDING