Monday, November 11, 2024

Take a peek behind the curtain and test drive the NEW StateNews.com today!

Bias clear in article on stem cell research, Proposal 2

In response to Selling cells (SN 10/8), I agree that stem cell research can be very beneficial to people with certain diseases and injuries and that we should try our hardest to find cures, but when research shows that adult stem cells work better than embryonic stem cells, why can’t they be used instead? Embryonic stem cell research is a highly controversial moral issue, while adult stem cells can be harvested harmlessly.

So far, embryonic stem cells have failed to treat diseases, and have caused terrible side effects. Adult stem cells, which can be taken from multiple parts of the body, have successfully treated diseases in humans such as cerebral palsy and multiple sclerosis, and have shown great promise in research regarding diseases such as diabetes and Parkinson’s disease. New technology also indicates that adult stem cells can have just as much potential to change into different kinds of cells as embryonic stem cells.

The push for embryonic stem cell research in the article really seems to be more of a push for funding for the university. The importance of competition with other universities took precedence over the moral implications of Proposal 2.

When voting in November, it is more important to remember what is morally right than what could give the university an opportunity to gain recognition. A human embryo is a human life. Destroying it for stem cells is not only wrong, but in the light of adult stem cell research, is totally unnecessary.

Megan Bowker

music performance freshman

Support student media! Please consider donating to The State News and help fund the future of journalism.

Discussion

Share and discuss “Bias clear in article on stem cell research, Proposal 2” on social media.