I am writing in response to the editorial "Nothing to fear," (SN 2/21).

This opinion piece demonstrates many of the problems inherent in the way some people view security and homeland security specifically. In reality, the Department of Homeland Security has bent over backward to accommodate public sentiment on many issues.

First of all, there was a total outrage when people perceived that the government had information about possible terror attacks and remained silent. So the Department of Homeland Security developed a warning system and became much more open about possible attacks. Then there was criticism that the government was overly alarmist.

The problem is that The State News and department Secretary Tom Ridge have fundamental differences on how to approach safety. Ridge actually has the hubris to believe that individuals should be aware of their surroundings and take steps to protect themselves. What is so wrong with that position? Apparently The State News feels that the government should be completely responsible for every aspect of its protection.

If the SN editorial board has problems with duct tape and plastic sheeting, would it also have a problem with the fact that people had little chance of surviving on Sept. 11, 2001? Would its advice be to just sit there and die?

In truth, the war on terrorism began right then and there. There is nothing, absolutely nothing, wrong with doing what you can with what you have. That is one of Ridge's messages, and I have the common courtesy to thank him for his advice. Through my actions and with the help of some tips from the government, I will do my best to be prepared.

So if you need some duct tape, just knock on my door.

Eric Morris
international relations and political theory and constitutional democracy junior