Saturday, November 21, 2009 | Since 1909 | East Lansing, MI Advertise | Classifieds | Puzzles | Employment | Contact Us
Feed:
Follow us on:
Mostly Cloudy, 45° F | 7° C
7 day forecast

Why I'm weary of English professors

By: Catherine Fish Posted: 07/31/08 10:59pm

Allow me to introduce myself. My name is Catherine. In this blog, I’m Probably Judging You, “you” refers to language elitists, grammar bumblers, and a variety of others to fall under my scrutiny. Am I being an elitist for blogging under such a title? Maybe. But anything more judicious, like our pal Judge Judy, risked copyright infringement. I’m over it. So let’s begin.

I’ve been correcting my English teachers since the eighth grade.

I’m oftentimes personally offended when I know more about grammar than my teacher or professor. You’re my teacher, for whom I am indirectly paying to teach me things I don’t know. Granted, we all have our specialties, and I fully acknowledge the intelligence of most of my instructors thus far. I’m sure the kid sitting next to me knows more about Metal Gear Solid — horrible example — than my professor. But I’m pretty sure the English language is sort of a cornerstone of all English professions. Maybe.

I don’t attribute these corrections to my stellar knowledge of the language; rather, I’ve been observing a trend of structural and syntactical apathy in every source of whose English sagacity is to be expected.

I suffered a depressing realization yesterday of how truly arbitrary languages are and will continue to be until the human race dies off or is otherwise incapacitated. I’ve always known that standard English isn’t exactly a tried-and-true formula developed from logic and rationale, but I’ve had faith in its existence for being a beacon of standard for speech and, more specifically, writing. In fact, I still maintain that faith, and acknowledging its arbitrariness will better serve me as an editor to take into account different dialects whose rules aren’t necessarily wrong; they simply aren’t accepted as the standard.

With that said, why do English teachers and professors continue to tell their students that knowing grammar isn’t important when their students are in class to become English teachers or some related field!? So yeah, I get it that grammar rules are wholly random, but a handful of linguists/lexicographers/otherwise knowledgeable individuals created these rules of English not to control or restrain it from development or growth but to establish principles for writing, learning, and structuring the language. You could violate myriad grammatical rules in everything you do and still make sense, but if everyone wrote how they believed a word should be written or how a sentence should be structured, you would have countless interpretations on your hands and may never quite understand what the writer is denoting, thus negating the purpose of language: communication.

English will change in the next few decades — that’s a given, and the change will not necessarily be unwelcome. In time rules will mirror the tendencies and conveniences of the population who speaks the language, so the tenets of grammar, spelling, speech, etc. will adjust accordingly. Nothing wrong with that. But DON’T, for the love of Jesus and other sons or daughters of alleged supreme beings, use the language’s inevitable change as an excuse to neither know nor teach your students grammar, if for nothing else than to explain the changes of grammar over centuries. Descriptive grammar is more important for language arts teachers to understand, blah blah blah. Okay, cool. But I guarantee you the lack of cornerstone knowledge of English grammar will eventually screw you over, be it in a job or with an inquisitive classroom.

As an editor and as an English teacher, one must know and understand the parts of speech and the elements of a sentence; how else will you explain to authors and students why something may sound better a certain way or and may have incorrect implications, especially concerning varying dialects? How else will you best define languages as a whole, as well as their functions and transitions across continents and time periods?

Maybe it’s a Michigan thing. Someone tell me it’s a Michigan thing. Please.

Jump to comments





PHOTOS OF THE WEEK:More reprints »
Sean Cook / The State News

Gov. Jennifer Granholm speaks to a crowd about the Michigan Promise Scholarship during a rally Wednesday morning outside the Administration Building. Granholm is touring colleges in Michigan to discuss the scholarship.

Powered by reprints.statenews.com.



Commentary:

Student

08/01/08 12:43am

Hmm. Looks like someone is full of themself.

HAM

08/01/08 7:03am

Wow, arrogance. Man that stuff be good written.

MSU ALUMN

08/01/08 7:59am

So how many times did you spell check and proof read this blog so you didn’t sound like a hypocrite?

Raymond

08/01/08 9:43am

Would you like to to borrow a brace to prop up your swelled ego?

I can't come up with a snarky name

08/01/08 10:06am

My eighth grade teacher gave us vocab-A-lary tests (not vocab-u-lary) on the Hulicaust (not Holocaust). We also learned about hyperbowls (not hyperboles).

I feel your pain.

Marci

08/01/08 10:30am

I’m curious as to which professors actually told you to disregard grammar, because I have yet to encounter that situation.

Scott

08/01/08 12:26pm

Is this just a straw man argument? Where are all these English professors and teachers who fit this description? Certainly not even one of the many teachers and professors I’ve had as a high school student, an undergrad majoring in English literature, and a grad student in applied linguistics. Certainly some teachers like this exist, but can you show that they are in the majority? Your grammar seems fine, but maybe you need to spend a bit more time honing your critical argument and research skills, which are just as important, if not more so, than proper grammar when it comes to writing.

Newspeak

08/01/08 1:17pm

Catherine, you’re an English major, so you must have surely answered your own question when you read 1984. This is how we are systematically dumbed down by the Department of Education. The structure of education is designed from the top down and it is a national initiative to not teach children grammar. As such, literary competency has plummeted. This is Newspeak.

Steph

08/01/08 3:32pm

What are the rules on overuse of italics?

me

08/01/08 3:35pm

You need a comma after “In time.”

haha!

08/03/08 9:55pm

lol .. i seez mestakes in artikle!

Also the verfication question:
We need to verify that you are, in fact, human.
What is the name of the first US president?

How very american centric of your website. Excuse me while i google the answer.